{"check":null,"uid":"4675eea33277a329","title":"Bill No. XXXII of 2026","title_generated":false,"country":"Индия","organ":"Парламент Индии","kind":"law","kind_name":"Законодательство","lang":"en","date":"2026-03-13","summary":"Обязывает операторов платформ, где пользователи создают и распространяют контент, модерировать его прозрачно и по внятной процедуре и вести внутренние записи о системных рисках дизайна и алгоритмического продвижения. «Значимые» платформы (порог по числу пользователей задаёт правительство) ежегодно оценивают влияние на выборы, здравоохранение и общественное согласие, публикуют выводы с принятыми мерами и простым языком объясняют, как автоматика влияет на видимость общественно значимого контента, не раскрывая проприетарных сведений. Вредный контент определён через дезинформацию, дипфейки, выдачу себя за другого и скоординированное неаутентичное поведение; пострадавшему полагается компенсация по ст. 45 Закона об информационных технологиях 2000 года.","snippet":"","topics":["Искусственный интеллект","Регулирование контента","Цифровые платформы и сервисы"],"status":"ok","error":"","text_len":9806,"versions":2,"url":"https://sansad.in/getFile/BillsTexts/RSBillTexts/Asintroduced/11e3192026103202AM.pdf?source=legislation","first_seen":"2026-08-19","last_checked":"2026-09-17 02:51","relevance":"hit","score":7,"query":"","source_key":"generic:sansad.in","verdict":{"relevance":"hit","score":7,"topics":["Искусственный интеллект","Регулирование контента","Цифровые платформы и сервисы"],"need_body":3,"authorities":[],"evidence":[{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"алгоритм","weak":true,"pos":210,"ctx":"о прозрачно и по внятной процедуре и вести внутренние записи о системных рисках дизайна и алгоритмического продвижения. «значимые» платформы (порог по числу пользователей задаёт правительство) еже","zone":"название","weight":1},{"topic":"Регулирование контента","term":"дезинформац","weak":true,"pos":592,"ctx":"значимого контента, не раскрывая проприетарных сведений. вредный контент определён через дезинформацию, дипфейки, выдачу себя за другого и скоординированное неаутентичное поведение; пострадавш","zone":"название","weight":1},{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"дипфейк","weak":false,"pos":607,"ctx":"ента, не раскрывая проприетарных сведений. вредный контент определён через дезинформацию, дипфейки, выдачу себя за другого и скоординированное неаутентичное поведение; пострадавшему полага","zone":"название","weight":3},{"topic":"Цифровые платформы и сервисы","term":"информационн технолог","weak":true,"pos":742,"ctx":"ованное неаутентичное поведение; пострадавшему полагается компенсация по ст. 45 закона об информационных технологиях 2000 года.","zone":"название","weight":1},{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"algorithmic","weak":true,"pos":1464,"ctx":"users or groups of users, whether through text, audio, video, images, live transmission, algorithmic recommendation or any other digital means, and includes social networking services, conte","zone":"текст","weight":0},{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"deepfake","weak":false,"pos":2584,"ctx":"tement of fact, where its dissemination is reasonably likely to cause such harm;  ## (ii) deepfakes, being digitally manipulated or  fabricated digital content, including but not limited to","zone":"текст","weight":1},{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"algorithmic","weak":true,"pos":4711,"ctx":"erest discourse;  (b) maintain internal records of systemic risks arising from the design algorithmic amplification or other operational features of the digital networking platform; and (c) t","zone":"текст","weight":0},{"topic":"Искусственный интеллект","term":"algorithmic","weak":true,"pos":8435,"ctx":"gulate intermediary liability and due diligence. however, certain systemic issues—such as algorithmic amplification of public-interest content, electoral integrity, and democratic discourse—r","zone":"текст","weight":0}],"dropped":[{"topic":"Цифровые платформы и сервисы","term":"online platform","weak":false,"pos":1138,"ctx":"available on a digital networking platform;  (b) “digital networking platform” means any online platform, website, application or digital service that— (i) enables users to create, upload, share","why":"одиночное упоминание (нужно 3)"},{"topic":"Регулирование контента","term":"harmful content","weak":false,"pos":2015,"ctx":"easures taken by a platform operator to comply with the obligations under this act;  (d) “harmful content” means any content of a digital networking platform which, while not unlawful under any l","why":"одиночное упоминание (нужно 3)"},{"topic":"Регулирование контента","term":"misinformation","weak":true,"pos":2399,"ctx":"the safety of children, or the dignity and reputation of an individual, and includes— (i) misinformation, being information that is false or materially misleading and presented as a statement of","why":"одиночное упоминание (нужно 3)"},{"topic":"Электронная коммерция и платежи","term":"digital content","weak":false,"pos":2638,"ctx":"likely to cause such harm;  ## (ii) deepfakes, being digitally manipulated or  fabricated digital content, including but not limited to images, videos or audio recordings, generated with the inte","why":"одиночное упоминание (нужно 3)"}]},"last_changed":"2026-09-17","meta":{},"source_url":"https://sansad.in/getFile/BillsTexts/RSBillTexts/Asintroduced/11e3192026103202AM.pdf?source=legislation","text":"## AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA\n\n## ON THE 13TH MARCH, 2026\n\n## Bill No. XXXII of 2026\n\n## THE DIGITAL NETWORKING PLATFORMS\n\n## (ACCOUNTABILITY AND USER PROTECTION)\n\n## BILL, 2026\n\nA\n\nBILL to provide for accountability, transparency and due diligence obligations of Digital Networking Platforms; to protect users’ rights; to prevent misuse of digital networking services for unlawful, harmful or deceptive purposes; and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.\n\nBE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventy-seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows:—\n\n1. (1) This Act may be called the Digital Networking Platforms (Accountability and User Protection) Act, 2026.\n\n(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in Official Gazette, appoint.\n\nShort title and commencement.\n\nDefinitions. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) “content” means any information, data, message, text, image, audio, video, live stream, synthetic media, or any combination thereof, made available on a Digital Networking Platform;\n\n(b) “Digital Networking Platform” means any online platform, website, application or digital service that— (i) enables users to create, upload, share, disseminate, discover or interact with content; and (ii) facilitates networking, communication, engagement or amplification among users or groups of users, whether through text, audio, video, images, live transmission, algorithmic recommendation or any other digital means, and includes social networking services, contentsharing platforms, discussion forums, micro blogging services, video-sharing services and similar intermediaries, but does not include private one-to-one communication services used exclusively for personal communication, or internal enterprise communication tools used solely within an organisation;\n\n(c) “due diligence” means reasonable and proportionate measures taken by a platform operator to comply with the obligations under this Act;\n\n(d) “harmful content” means any content of a Digital Networking Platform which, while not unlawful under any law for the time being in force, is created, published or disseminated in a manner that is reasonably likely to cause significant and demonstrable harm to public order, electoral integrity, the safety of children, or the dignity and reputation of an individual, and includes— (i) misinformation, being information that is false or materially misleading and presented as a statement of fact, where its dissemination is reasonably likely to cause such harm;\n\n## (ii) deepfakes, being digitally manipulated or\n\nfabricated digital content, including but not limited to images, videos or audio recordings, generated with the intent to convincingly and deceptively depict subjects or issues or represent individuals engaging in actions, making statements, or being in circumstances that did not occur or exist in reality, and which is reasonably likely to deceive the public;\n\n(iii) impersonation, being the unauthorised use of the name, likeness, identity or identifying attributes of another person with intent to deceive users as to the source or authenticity of content; and (iv) coordinated inauthentic behaviour, being organised use of multiple accounts, automated systems or fictitious identities acting in concert to mislead users regarding the origin, amplification or authenticity of content;\n\n(e) “intermediary” shall have the meaning as assigned to it in clause (w) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000;\n\n21 of 2000.\n\n(f) “platform operator” means any person, company or other legal entity that owns, controls or operates a Digital Networking Platform;\n\n(g) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;\n\n(h) “significant Digital Networking Platform” means a Digital Networking Platform having such number of users or such systemic impact on public discourse as may be prescribed;\n\n(i) “unlawful content” means any content of a Digital Networking Platform, the publication, transmission or dissemination of which is prohibited under any law for the time being in force in India; and (j) “user” means any person who accesses, uses, creates, uploads or interacts with content on a Digital Networking Platform.\n\n3. (1)Without prejudice to obligations under any other law for the time being in force, every platform operator shall— (a) ensure procedural fairness and transparency in the moderation of content, including measures designed to prevent, detect and remove harmful and unlawful content, particularly where such moderation impacts public interest discourse;\n\n(b) maintain internal records of systemic risks arising from the design algorithmic amplification or other operational features of the Digital Networking Platform; and (c) take such other measures as may be prescribed.\n\n(2) Every significant Digital Networking Platform shall, in addition to the obligations specified in sub-section (1), — (a) conduct annual public-interest impact assessments in relation to matters including elections, public health and social harmony in such manner as may be prescribed; and (b) publish, in such manner as may be prescribed, a summary of the findings of such assessments and the mitigation measures adopted in response thereto.\n\nObligations of platform operators and significant Digital Networking Platforms.\n\n4. (1)Every significant Digital Networking Platform shall publish, in clear and plain-language, explanations describing the manner in which its automated systems may influence the visibility, prioritization or dissemination of content relating to matters of public interest, in such form and manner as may be prescribed.\n\n## (2)The requirement of disclosure under sub-section (1) shall—\n\n(a) be limited to the systemic effects of the automated systems;\n\n(b) not duplicate transparency requirements under any other law for the time being in force; and (c) not include proprietary information.\n\nDisclosure.\n\n21 of 2000.\n\n5. Whoever fails to comply with the provisions of this Act or the rules made there under shall be liable to pay as compensation to the person affected by such non-compliance, the amount specified under 45 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.\n\nCompensation for noncompliance.\n\n6. (1) The Central Government may, by notification published in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this act.\n\n(2) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it\n\nPower to make rules.\n\nis made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may comprise of one session or two or more successive sessions. If before the expiry of the session, immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both the Houses are in agreement of any applicable modification in the rule(s) or both the Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may so be. However, that any such modification or annulment shall be, without prejudice, to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.\n\nAct to be in addition to existing laws.\n\n7.\n\nThe provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other law for the time being in force.\n\nPower to remove difficulties.\n\n8.\n\n(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty.\n\n(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.\n\n.\n\nSavings.\n\n9. (1) The provisions of this Act shall apply only to matters not expressly provided for under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the rules made thereunder.\n\n(2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to override, replace or duplicate the obligations, due diligence requirements, or enforcement mechanisms as are already applicable to intermediaries under any law for the time being in force.\n\n21 of 2000.\n\n## STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS\n\nThe Information Technology Act, 2000 and the rules made thereunder regulate intermediary liability and due diligence. However, certain systemic issues—such as algorithmic amplification of public-interest content, electoral integrity, and democratic discourse—remain insufficiently addressed through existing frameworks.\n\nThis Bill therefore seeks to supplement, and not duplicate, existing digital laws by introducing narrowly tailored accountability mechanisms focused on transparency, procedural fairness and parliamentary oversight, while fully preserving constitutional freedoms and innovation in the digital ecosystem.\n\nHence, this Bill.\n\n## V. SIVADASAN.\n\n## MEMORANDUM REGARDING DELEGATED LEGISLATION\n\nClause 6 of the Bill empowers the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the purposes of the Bill. Clause8 of the Bill provides that the Central Government may make such provisions, by order, as may be necessary for removing any difficulty in giving effect to the provisions of this Bill.\n\nAs the rules and orders will relate to matters of details only, the delegation of legislative power is of a normal character.\n\n.\n\n## RAJYA SABHA\n\n__________\n\nA\n\nBILL to provide for accountability, transparency and due diligence obligations of\n\nDigital Networking Platforms; to protect users’ rights; to prevent misuse of digital networking services for unlawful, harmful or deceptive purposes; and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.\n\n__________ (Dr. V. Sivadasan, M.P.)\n\nRS-P&P-PMB(E)—151—16.03.2026.","changes":[{"id":953,"doc_id":56,"v_from":496,"v_to":14778,"detected_at":"2026-09-17 02:51:16","added":15,"removed":15,"summary":"--- \n+++ \n-(2)It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in Official Gazette, appoint.\n+(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in Official Gazette, appoint.\n-Definitions. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a)“content” means any information, data, message, text, image, audio, video, live stream, synthetic media, or any combination thereof, made available on a Digital Networking Platform;\n+Definitions. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) “content” means any information, data, message, text, image, audio, video, live stream, synthetic media, or any combination thereof, made available on a Digital Networking Platform;\n-(c)“due diligence” means reasonable and proportionate measures taken by a platform operator to comply with the obligations under this Act;\n+(c) “due diligence” means reasonable and proportionate measures taken by a platform operator to comply with the obligations under this Act;\n-(d)“harmful content” means any content of a Digital Networking Platform which, while not unlawful under any law for the time being in force, is created, published or disseminated in a manner that is reasonably likely to cause significant and demonstrable harm to public order, electoral integrity, the safety of children, or the dignity and reputation of an individual, and includes— (i)misinformation, being information that is false or materially misleading and presented as a statement of fact, where its dissemination is reasonably likely to cause such harm;\n+(d) “harmful content” means any content of a Digital Networking Platform which, while not unlawful under any law for the time being in force, is created, published or disseminated in a manner that is reasonably likely to cause significant and demonstrable harm to public order, electoral integrity, the safety of children, or the dignity and reputation of an individual, and includes— (i) misinformation, being information that is false or materially misleading and presented as a statement of fact, where its dissemination is reasonably likely to cause such harm;\n-## (ii)deepfakes, being digitally manipulated or\n+## (ii) deepfakes, being digitally manipulated or\n-(iii)impersonation, being the unauthorised use of the name, likeness, identity or identifying attributes of another person with intent to deceive users as to the source or authenticity of content; and (iv) coordinated inauthentic behaviour, being organised use of multiple accounts, automated systems or fictitious identities acting in concert to mislead users regarding the origin, amplification or authenticity of content;\n+(iii) impersonation, being the unauthorised use of the name, likeness, identity or identifying attributes of another person with intent to deceive users as to the source or authenticity of content; and (iv) coordinated inauthentic behaviour, being organised use of multiple accounts, automated systems or fictitious identities acting in concert to mislead users regarding the origin, amplification or authenticity of content;\n-(e)“intermediary” shall have the meaning as assigned to it in clause (w) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000;\n+(e) “intermediary” shall have the meaning as assigned to it in clause (w) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000;\n-(f)“platform operator” means any person, company or other legal entity that owns, controls or operates a Digital Networking Platform;\n+(f) “platform operator” means any person, company or other legal entity that owns, controls or operates a Digital Networking Platform;\n-(g)“prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;\n+(g) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;\n-(h)“significant Digital Networking Platform” means a Digital Networking Platform having such number of users or such systemic impact on public discourse as may be prescribed;\n+(h)"}],"passport":{"data":{"act":{"jurisdiction":"Индия","title_official":"The Digital Networking Platforms (Accountability and User Protection) Bill, 2026","title_short":"","level":"законопроект","date_adopted":"2026-03-13","date_in_force":"на дату, назначаемую Центральным Правительством уведомлением в Official Gazette","date_version":"внесённая версия от 2026-03-13","phased":"","status":"законопроект: на рассмотрении","sunset":"не установлен","regulator":"Центральное Правительство Индии; применяющий орган по компенсации — определяется со ссылкой на Закон об информационных технологиях 2000 года","related":"Information Technology Act, 2000 (в т.ч. ст. 45); правила, принимаемые во исполнение настоящего законопроекта"},"goal":{"problem":"недостаточная регламентация системных рисков алгоритмического продвижения общественно значимого контента, угрозы избирательной целостности, общественному согласию и правам пользователей.","goal":"ввести подотчётность, прозрачность и обязанности должной осмотрительности для платформ цифровых сетей; защитить права пользователей; предотвратить неправомерное/вредное/обманное использование сервисов при сохранении конституционных свобод и инноваций.","targets":"ежегодная оценка воздействия «значимыми» платформами по вопросам выборов, здравоохранения и общественного согласия с публикацией выводов и мер смягчения.","scope":"операторы платформ цифровых сетей, где пользователи создают и распространяют контент; отдельно — «значимые» платформы (пороги устанавливаются правительством).","exclusions":"частные однонаправленные коммуникации исключительно личного характера; внутренние корпоративные средства связи внутри организации; положения действуют дополнительно к IT Act, 2000 без дублирования существующих обязанностей посредников."},"subjects_note":{"protected":"дети (безопасность), участники избирательного процесса (целостность выборов), лица в контексте достоинства и репутации, широкая общественность (общественное согласие, общественное здравоохранение)."},"subjects":[{"role":"оператор","who":"platform operator — любое лицо/компания/субъект права, владеющий, контролирующий или эксплуатирующий платформу цифровой сети.","criteria":"любая платформа онлайн, позволяющая создавать/загружать/распространять/открывать/взаимодействовать с контентом и обеспечивающая сетевое взаимодействие/коммуникацию/вовлечение/усиление между пользователями любым цифровым способом.","count":""}],"norms":[{"address":"ст. 3(1)(a)","addressee":"оператор","essence":"обеспечить процедурную справедливость и прозрачность модерации, включая меры предотвращения, обнаружения и удаления вредного и незаконного контента, особенно когда это затрагивает общественный дискурс.","type":"обязанность","mechanism":"операционные издержки","cost_channel":"административные, содержательные","cost_kind":"регулярные","trigger":"постоянно","sanction":"компенсация пострадавшему лицу по размеру из ст. 45 Закона об информационных технологиях 2000 г. (ст. 5 отсылочно)","refs":"да, к Закону об информационных технологиях 2000 г.","form":"цифровая/модерационные процессы; форма уточняется правилами","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"сопоставимо с обязанностями площадок по прозрачной модерации и процедурам рассмотрения жалоб в РФ (ФЗ-149; требования о прозрачности правил сервиса), но индийский проект добавляет акцент на предотвращение вреда вне незаконности и отдельный учёт влияния на общественный дискурс; требует проверки деталей реализации."},{"address":"ст. 3(1)(b)","addressee":"оператор","essence":"вести внутренние записи о системных рисках дизайна, алгоритмического усиления и иных эксплуатационных характеристик платформы.","type":"обязанность","mechanism":"операционные издержки","cost_channel":"административные, содержательные","cost_kind":"регулярные","trigger":"постоянно","sanction":"компенсация по ст. 45 IT Act, 2000 через ст. 5 проекта","refs":"да, к IT Act, 2000","form":"внутренняя документация; формат может быть уточнён правилами","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"частичные аналоги требований документирования процессов безопасности и управления рисками у крупных площадок есть (подходы ФЗ-149/ФЗ-152), однако прямой общей обязанности фиксировать «системные риски алгоритмического усиления» в таком виде нет; требуется проверка профильных актов."},{"address":"ст. 3(2)(a)","addressee":"значительная платформа","essence":"ежегодно проводить оценку воздействия в общественных интересах по темам, включая выборы, общественное здравоохранение и социальное согласие, установленным образом.","type":"обязанность","mechanism":"операционные издержки","cost_channel":"административные, содержательные","cost_kind":"регулярные (ежегодно)","trigger":"раз в год","sanction":"компенсация по ст. 45 IT Act, 2000 через ст. 5 проекта","refs":"да, к IT Act, 2000","form":"письменная/цифровая отчётность; детали определяются правилами","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"прямых аналогов обязательной ежегодной оценки по выборам/здравоохранению/социальному согласию для интернет-платформ нет; точечные механизмы саморегулирования существуют, правовой режим отличается; требует проверки."},{"address":"ст. 3(2)(b)","addressee":"значительная платформа","essence":"публиковать сводку результатов оценок и принятых мер смягчения установленным порядком.","type":"обязанность","mechanism":"информирование","cost_channel":"административные","cost_kind":"регулярные (ежегодно)","trigger":"после проведения годовой оценки","sanction":"компенсация по ст. 45 IT Act, 2000 через ст. 5 проекта","refs":"да, к IT Act, 2000","form":"публичная публикация (форма устанавливается правилами)","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"требование публичной публикации подобных годовых отчётов специально по указанным тематикам прямо не установлено; отдельные раскрытия информации предусмотрены иными законами, отличия существенны; требует проверки."},{"address":"ст. 4(1)","addressee":"значительная платформа","essence":"публиковать понятные объяснения того, как автоматизированные системы могут влиять на видимость, приоритезацию или распространение общественно значимого контента, без раскрытия проприетарной информации.","type":"обязанность","mechanism":"информирование","cost_channel":"административные, содержательные","cost_kind":"регулярные","trigger":"постоянно/доступно публично","sanction":"компенсация по ст. 45 IT Act, 2000 через ст. 5 проекта","refs":"да, к IT Act, 2000","form":"публичная информация простым языком; способ определяет правительство","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"схожая идея частично отражена в требованиях к прозрачности рекомендательных систем и маркировке рекламы/автоматизированных решений (ФЗ-149, изменения последних лет), но объём и формулировки отличаются; требуется проверка соответствия."},{"address":"ст. 5","addressee":"любой нарушитель положений проекта или принятых правил","essence":"выплатить компенсацию пострадавшему лицу в размере, установленном ст. 45 Закона об информационных технологиях 2000 года.","type":"ответственность","mechanism":"распределение риска","cost_channel":"прямые выплаты","cost_kind":"по событию","trigger":"факт несоблюдения норм проекта/правил, повлекший вред","sanction":"денежная компенсация по ставке из ст. 45 IT Act, 2000","refs":"прямая отсылка к ст. 45 IT Act, 2000","form":"выплата потерпевшему","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"гражданско-правовая ответственность за нарушение информационного законодательства существует (ГК РФ, специальные законы), но привязки к конкретной статье-компасу размера, как здесь, нет; механизм и размеры иные; требует проверки."},{"address":"ст. 2(d)(i–iv)","addressee":"применяется ко всем субъектам при квалификации контента","essence":"определить «вредный контент» как дезинформацию, дипфейки, выдачу себя за другое лицо и скоординированное неаутентичное поведение, способные причинить значительный доказуемый вред.","type":"ограничение/квалификация","mechanism":"барьер входа для определённых практик распространения","cost_channel":"содержательные, административные","cost_kind":"по событию","trigger":"выявление соответствующего контента/поведения","sanction":"опосредованно — через обязательства операторов и компенсацию по ст. 5","refs":"действует наряду с запретами иного действующего законодательства","form":"применение критериев оператором и/или регулятором","in_force":"основная дата вступления закона в силу","ru_analog":"элементы регулирования недостоверной информации и синтетических медиа присутствуют (ФЗ-149, практика маркировки и ограничений), состав категорий шире и иначе сформулирован; прямое совпадение отсутствует; требует проверки."}]},"made_by":"GigaChat-3-Ultra","made_at":"2026-09-17 04:50:11","edited_at":null,"edited_by":null}}